On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >
> > So section mismatch warnings are more about catching sloopy usage of __init
> > than it is to
> > catch potential kernel oopesen. But the latter is a nice side effect that
> > is appreciated.
>
> My point was that I cannot r
On Sun, 27 May 2007 11:56:21 +0200 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > So section mismatch warnings are more about catching sloopy usage of __init
> > than it is to
> > catch potential kernel oopesen. But the latter is a nice side effect that
> > is appreciated.
>
> My point was t
> The whole purpose with __init and friends are the possibility to drop
> the .init.text (+ .init.data) section when the kernel is up and running.
I know what they do, you don't need to repeatedly reexplain them.
My point was just that in all the __init/__initdata warnings I recently fixed
perso
>
> So section mismatch warnings are more about catching sloopy usage of __init
> than it is to
> catch potential kernel oopesen. But the latter is a nice side effect that is
> appreciated.
My point was that I cannot recall a single real oops bug found by the compile
time checking.
We had a f
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:02:08PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:07:24 Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> >
> > Did the patches reach 2.6.22-rc3 yet?
>
> No.
>
> >
> > If they did, then the following warnings might need fixing:
>
> There is already one patch queued for it. But
On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:07:24 Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> Did the patches reach 2.6.22-rc3 yet?
No.
>
> If they did, then the following warnings might need fixing:
There is already one patch queued for it. But actually in my experience I cannot
remember a single real bug showed by these warn
On Mon, May 21, 2007 17:11, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > There was another patch that removed the __init marker to _fix_ section
>> > mismatch errors.
>> > I have lost the actual mail but I asked the submitte
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > There was another patch that removed the __init marker to _fix_ section
> > mismatch errors.
> > I have lost the actual mail but I asked the submitter to send me a copy of
> > the configuration so I coul
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> There was another patch that removed the __init marker to _fix_ section
> mismatch errors.
> I have lost the actual mail but I asked the submitter to send me a copy of
> the configuration so I could take a closer look.
> Obviously it was the wrong fix to remove the _init mark
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:48:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:39:31PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 May 2007 15:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > >> Following section mismatch warnings were reported by Andrey Borzenkov:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:39:31PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 May 2007 15:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> >> Following section mismatch warnings were reported by Andrey Borzenkov:
> >>
> >
> > In what configuration? I don't see this.
>
> I'm pret
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 19 May 2007 15:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
>> Following section mismatch warnings were reported by Andrey Borzenkov:
>>
>
> In what configuration? I don't see this.
I'm pretty sure I made those functions __init when I cleaned up that
code. Did those pieces of
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 19 May 2007 15:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Following section mismatch warnings were reported by Andrey Borzenkov:
>
> In what configuration? I don't see this.
I assumed that enabling CONFIG_MTRR would be enough to trigger it
On Saturday 19 May 2007 15:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Following section mismatch warnings were reported by Andrey Borzenkov:
In what configuration? I don't see this.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More m
Following section mismatch warnings were reported by Andrey Borzenkov:
WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:amd_init_mtrr from .text between 'mtrr_bp_init' (at offset 0x967a)
and 'mtrr_attrib_to_str'
WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o - Section misma
15 matches
Mail list logo
