On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:13:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > It would be better to have a definition we could use from assembler
> > code but I did not find a suitable header file for it.
>
> hm, include/asm-x86/linkage.h?
No - it is for general use so it should live in include/linux/*
* Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without this patch the linker will generate a section named
> .sched.text.1 which is unexpected. This is because the gcc generated
> section has "ax" but the assembler usage of .sched.text lacks the "ax"
> specifier.
thanks, applied.
> It would be
* Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without this patch the linker will generate a section named
.sched.text.1 which is unexpected. This is because the gcc generated
section has ax but the assembler usage of .sched.text lacks the ax
specifier.
thanks, applied.
It would be better to
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:13:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
It would be better to have a definition we could use from assembler
code but I did not find a suitable header file for it.
hm, include/asm-x86/linkage.h?
No - it is for general use so it should live in include/linux/*
Without this patch the linker will generate a section
named .sched.text.1 which is unexpected.
This is because the gcc generated section has "ax" but the
assembler usage of .sched.text lacks the "ax" specifier.
It would be better to have a definition we could use from
assembler code but I did not
Without this patch the linker will generate a section
named .sched.text.1 which is unexpected.
This is because the gcc generated section has ax but the
assembler usage of .sched.text lacks the ax specifier.
It would be better to have a definition we could use from
assembler code but I did not
6 matches
Mail list logo
