Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> in what way have you tested it? Have you tried iopl() and ioperm() >>> syscalls to check whether they properly block/allow port IO? >> I made a little app to check that iopl() and ioperm() were working >> properly. > > cool, t

Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

* Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in what way have you tested it? Have you tried iopl() and ioperm() > > syscalls to check whether they properly block/allow port IO? > > I made a little app to check that iopl() and ioperm() were working > properly. cool, thx. Could you check wheth

Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ioport_{32|64}.c unification. >> >> This patch unifies the code from the ioport_32.c and ioport_64.c >> files. >> >> Tested and working fine with i386 and x86_64 kernels. > > in what way have you tested it? Have you tried iopl()

Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

* Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ioport_{32|64}.c unification. > > This patch unifies the code from the ioport_32.c and ioport_64.c > files. > > Tested and working fine with i386 and x86_64 kernels. in what way have you tested it? Have you tried iopl() and ioperm() syscalls to che

[PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

ioport_{32|64}.c unification. This patch unifies the code from the ioport_32.c and ioport_64.c files. Tested and working fine with i386 and x86_64 kernels. Signed-off-by: Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile index 0903bbf..92d9ac6 100