On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:32:44PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:25:15AM -0800, Daniel Xu wrote:
> > > BTW, is this a regression? or CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC has this issue before?
> > > It seems that the above commit just changed the default unwinder. This
> > > means
> > >
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:25:15AM -0800, Daniel Xu wrote:
> > BTW, is this a regression? or CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC has this issue before?
> > It seems that the above commit just changed the default unwinder. This means
> > OCR stack unwinder has this bug before that commit.
>
> I see your point -- I
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:58:09PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 18:28:06 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:07:52 -0800
> > Daniel Xu wrote:
> >
> > > Getting a stack trace from inside a kretprobe used to work with frame
> > >
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 18:28:06 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:07:52 -0800
> Daniel Xu wrote:
>
> > Getting a stack trace from inside a kretprobe used to work with frame
> > pointer stack walks. After the default unwinder was switched to ORC,
> > stack traces
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:07:52 -0800
Daniel Xu wrote:
> Getting a stack trace from inside a kretprobe used to work with frame
> pointer stack walks. After the default unwinder was switched to ORC,
> stack traces broke because ORC did not know how to skip the
> `kretprobe_trampoline` "fr
Getting a stack trace from inside a kretprobe used to work with frame
pointer stack walks. After the default unwinder was switched to ORC,
stack traces broke because ORC did not know how to skip the
`kretprobe_trampoline` "frame".
Frame based stack walks used to work with kretprobes because
`kretp
6 matches
Mail list logo