4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
Signed-off-by: chenzefeng
On x86-64, for 32-bit PC-relacive branches, we can generate PLT32
relocation, instead of PC32 relocation. and R_X86_64_PLT32 can be
treated the same as R_X86_64_PC32 since li
sjenn...@redhat.com; vojt...@suse.com; t...@linutronix.de; mi...@redhat.com;
h...@zytor.com; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; x...@kernel.org;
live-patch...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Xiexiuqi
主题: Re:[PATCH] x86: livepatch: Treat R_X86_64_PLT32 as R_X86_64_PC32
On Mon 2019-02-
On Mon 2019-02-18 17:22, Petr wrote:
> On Mon 2019-02-18 13:29:11, chengjian (D) wrote:
> > Hi,Jiri
> >
> >
> > This patch should be merged into 4.4 stable,
> >
> > which still use klp_write_module_reloc.
> >
> >
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.4.174/source/arch/x86/kernel/livep
> > atch.c
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 02:01:31AM +, chenzefeng (A) wrote:
> On x86-64, for 32-bit PC-relacive branches, we can generate PLT32 relocation,
> instead of PC32 relocation. and R_X86_64_PLT32 can be treated the same as
> R_X86_64_PC32 since linux kernel doesn't use PLT.
>
> In linux 4.4 commit
On Mon 2019-02-18 13:29:11, chengjian (D) wrote:
> Hi,Jiri
>
>
> This patch should be merged into 4.4 stable,
>
> which still use klp_write_module_reloc.
>
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.4.174/source/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
>
>
> ZeFeng may have sent a stable(4.4-y) patch to the
Hi,Jiri
This patch should be merged into 4.4 stable,
which still use klp_write_module_reloc.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.4.174/source/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
ZeFeng may have sent a stable(4.4-y) patch to the wrong mail-list(mainline).
Thanks.
On 2019/2/15 15:28, Jiri Kosina w
On Fri 2019-02-15 08:17:36, chenzefeng (A) wrote:
> HI, Jiri Kosina,
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, chenzefeng (A) wrote:
>
> >> On x86-64, for 32-bit PC-relacive branches, we can generate PLT32
> >> relocation, instead of PC32 relocation. and R_X86_64_PLT32
HI, Jiri Kosina,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, chenzefeng (A) wrote:
>> On x86-64, for 32-bit PC-relacive branches, we can generate PLT32
>> relocation, instead of PC32 relocation. and R_X86_64_PLT32 can be
>> treated the same as R_X86_64_PC32 since linux kernel
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, chenzefeng (A) wrote:
> On x86-64, for 32-bit PC-relacive branches, we can generate PLT32
> relocation, instead of PC32 relocation. and R_X86_64_PLT32 can be
> treated the same as R_X86_64_PC32 since linux kernel doesn't use PLT.
>
> In linux 4.4 commit b21ebf2fb4cd ("x86:
On x86-64, for 32-bit PC-relacive branches, we can generate PLT32 relocation,
instead of PC32 relocation. and R_X86_64_PLT32 can be treated the same as
R_X86_64_PC32 since linux kernel doesn't use PLT.
In linux 4.4 commit b21ebf2fb4cd ("x86: Treat R_X86_64_PLT32 as R_X86_64_PC32")
been fixed fo
10 matches
Mail list logo