* Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [PATCH] x86_64: change aper valid checking sequence
>
> old sequence:
> size ==> >4G ==> point to RAM
> changed to
> >4G ==> point to RAM ==> size
>
> some bios even leave aper to unclear, so ch
* Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: change aper valid checking sequence
old sequence:
size == 4G == point to RAM
changed to
4G == point to RAM == size
some bios even leave aper to unclear, so check size at last.
to avoid reporting that like
Node 0: Aperture
[PATCH] x86_64: change aper valid checking sequence
old sequence:
size ==> >4G ==> point to RAM
changed to
>4G ==> point to RAM ==> size
some bios even leave aper to unclear, so check size at last.
to avoid reporting that like
Node 0: Aperture @ 4a4200 size 32 MB
Apertur
[PATCH] x86_64: change aper valid checking sequence
old sequence:
size == 4G == point to RAM
changed to
4G == point to RAM == size
some bios even leave aper to unclear, so check size at last.
to avoid reporting that like
Node 0: Aperture @ 4a4200 size 32 MB
Aperture too small (32 MB
4 matches
Mail list logo