Re: [PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)

Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:40:46AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. >> Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. > > I don't think that's true. I prefer to keep the message. > How about

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:40:46AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. > Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. I don't think that's true. I prefer to keep the message. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:40:46AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. I don't think that's true. I prefer to keep the message. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)

Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:40:46AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. I don't think that's true. I prefer to keep the message. How about limiting

[PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)

>From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. Also remove possibility of dmesg spamming. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S |4 ++--

[PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)

From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. Also remove possibility of dmesg spamming. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S |4 ++--