On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:33 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:23 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > > return value. The
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:23 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:23 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> Cc: Seth Jennings
> Cc: Dan Streetman
>
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Cc: Seth Jennings
Cc: Dan Streetman
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
mm/zswap.c | 2
4 matches
Mail list logo