Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-09 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/09/2012 03:18 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: >> Most distros already have or are on the way to switch to systemd. > > We have to adapt to distros once more:( Well they are the customer... (OK, maybe not _the_ customer, but definitely a major customer). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-09 Thread Hillf Danton
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:07 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:23 PM, richard -rw- weinberger >> wrote: >>> >>> Not supporting cgroups is no-go. >>> >> Then what is the point of supporting cgroups for surfing T, F

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-09 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:23 PM, richard -rw- weinberger > wrote: >> >> Not supporting cgroups is no-go. >> > Then what is the point of supporting cgroups for surfing T, F and G, > watching video, and listening music with a netbook and/or noteb

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-09 Thread Hillf Danton
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:23 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > > Not supporting cgroups is no-go. > Then what is the point of supporting cgroups for surfing T, F and G, watching video, and listening music with a netbook and/or notebook? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-08 Thread Oleksandr Natalenko
What about BFS? 08.07.12 16:32, Chen написав(ла): > http://postimage.org/image/70q774n6b/ > > #COUNT CFS RIFS-V3-Trial > 1 9 9 > 2 92 9 > 4 2523663 > 8 8162585 > 16 16615 1150 > 32 31846 2147 > 64 54921 1375 > 128 90558 17

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-08 Thread Chen
http://postimage.org/image/70q774n6b/ #COUNT CFS RIFS-V3-Trial 1 9 9 2 92 9 4 2523663 8 8162585 16 16615 1150 32 31846 2147 64 54921 1375 128 90558 1761 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-08 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chen wrote: > But we can disable CGROUP while compiling. > Without CGROUP systemd will always sleep and that won't affect you > when you are using your box. Not supporting cgroups is no-go. -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-08 Thread Chen
But we can disable CGROUP while compiling. Without CGROUP systemd will always sleep and that won't affect you when you are using your box. On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > The funniest thing is that desktop users started to use systemd (e.g. in > Fedora) which means the

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-08 Thread Oleksandr Natalenko
The funniest thing is that desktop users started to use systemd (e.g. in Fedora) which means they cannot even boot without cgroups. Note that :). 08.07.12 06:37, Chen написав(ла): > I haven't made any support for Cgroup yet. After I finished > translating the scheduler in modular form it will supp

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-07 Thread Chen
I haven't made any support for Cgroup yet. After I finished translating the scheduler in modular form it will support Cgroup naturally since the modular scheduler support Cgroup. Anyway it is for desktop users and I don't think I have to support Cgroup in short term. I am going to post the graph

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-07 Thread Oleksandr Natalenko
Could you please make some chart to visually compare latencies with CFS? Also, has RIFS got cgroups support? 07.07.12 23:58, Chen написав(ла): > 1. Benchmark: > [admin@localhost ~]$ latt -c255 sleep 10 > > Parameters: min_wait=100ms, max_wait=500ms, clients=255 > Entries logged: 1020 > > Wakeup