Re: [PATCH *] new VM patch for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-15 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, James Lewis Nance wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 10:09:57PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today I released a new VM patch with 4 small improvements: > > Are these 4 improvements in the code test9-pre1 patch that Linus > just released? No. But I have a patch (

Re: [PATCH *] new VM patch for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-15 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, James Lewis Nance wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 10:09:57PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today I released a new VM patch with 4 small improvements: > > Are these 4 improvements in the code test9-pre1 patch that Linus > just released? Oh well, I may as well g

Re: [PATCH *] new VM patch for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-15 Thread James Lewis Nance
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 10:09:57PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > Hi, > > today I released a new VM patch with 4 small improvements: Are these 4 improvements in the code test9-pre1 patch that Linus just released? Jim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

[PATCH *] new VM patch for 2.4.0-test8

2000-09-15 Thread Rik van Riel
Hi, today I released a new VM patch with 4 small improvements: - fixed proc_misc.c compile warnings (Albert Cranford) - try_to_free_buffers() now actually /frees/ the buffers after doing synchronous IO on them ... - move pages with page->count==2 to the inactive_dirty list in deactivate_page