On Sun, Nov 23 2014 at 12:31pm -0500,
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 11:53 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Eric Dumazet
> > wrote:
> > > From: Eric Dumazet
> > >
> > > rcu_dereference() should be used in sections protected by rcu_read_lock.
> > >
>
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 11:53 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > rcu_dereference() should be used in sections protected by rcu_read_lock.
> >
> > For writers, holding some kind of mutex or lock,
> > rcu_dereference_prote
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> rcu_dereference() should be used in sections protected by rcu_read_lock.
>
> For writers, holding some kind of mutex or lock,
> rcu_dereference_protected() is the way to go, adding explicit lockdep
> bits.
>
> In __unb
From: Eric Dumazet
rcu_dereference() should be used in sections protected by rcu_read_lock.
For writers, holding some kind of mutex or lock,
rcu_dereference_protected() is the way to go, adding explicit lockdep
bits.
In __unbind(), although there is no mutex or lock held, we are about
to free t
4 matches
Mail list logo