an.ker...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:47 PM
> To: Moore, Robert
> Cc: LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH ] tbfadt.c: output warning only when 64bit 32bit
> address of FACS/DSDT all have value but not equal to each other
>
> Bob,
> How about moving some ch
l investigating
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ethan Zhao [mailto:ethan.ker...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 7:47 PM
>> To: Moore, Robert
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH ] tbfadt.c: output warning only when 64bit 32bit
>> address of FA
Ethan Zhao [mailto:ethan.ker...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 6:29 PM
> To: Moore, Robert
> Cc: Brown, Len; Zheng, Lv; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH ] tbfadt.c: output warning only when 64bit 32bit
> address of FACS/DSDT all have value but not equal to each other
>
&g
Bob,
Thanks for your detailed reviewing about the whole possible conditions.
I.C. So that is impossible zero value for Xfacs /Xdsdt if
facs/dsdt >0, for they are assigned in acpi_tb_convert_fadt(), I need
to move my eyes one line code higher to see why it yelled twice
but not using
eng, Lv; LKML
> Subject: [PATCH ] tbfadt.c: output warning only when 64bit 32bit address
> of FACS/DSDT all have value but not equal to each other
>
> Hi, Len, Robert,
>
>Please help to check the following patch, add more conditions when
> validate the 64bit 32bit F
Hi, Len, Robert,
Please help to check the following patch, add more conditions
when validate the 64bit 32bit FACS/DSDT address in FADT to follow ACPI
spec, In the meantime, keep the compatibility and latitude.
Thanks,
Ethan
>From c1116211a7b329c26b0370565c36b084ceb08f71 Mon Sep 17 00:0
6 matches
Mail list logo