Re: [PATCH -mm] remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD fixes

2012-07-25 Thread Minchan Kim
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:51:19PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Turns out I missed two spots where __GFP_NO_KSWAPD is used. > > The removal from the trace code is obvious, since the flag > got removed there is no need to print it. > > For mtdcore.c, now that memory compaction has been fixed, >

[PATCH -mm] remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD fixes

2012-07-25 Thread Rik van Riel
Turns out I missed two spots where __GFP_NO_KSWAPD is used. The removal from the trace code is obvious, since the flag got removed there is no need to print it. For mtdcore.c, now that memory compaction has been fixed, we should no longer see large swap storms from an attempt to allocate a large

[PATCH -mm] remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD fixes

2012-07-25 Thread Rik van Riel
Turns out I missed two spots where __GFP_NO_KSWAPD is used. The removal from the trace code is obvious, since the flag got removed there is no need to print it. For mtdcore.c, now that memory compaction has been fixed, we should no longer see large swap storms from an attempt to allocate a large

Re: [PATCH -mm] remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD fixes

2012-07-25 Thread Minchan Kim
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:51:19PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: Turns out I missed two spots where __GFP_NO_KSWAPD is used. The removal from the trace code is obvious, since the flag got removed there is no need to print it. For mtdcore.c, now that memory compaction has been fixed, we