On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:14:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is my patch proposal for detecting possible lockups, when
> > flush_workqueue caller holds a lock (e.g. rtnl_lock) also used in work
> > functions.
>
> looks good in
* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my patch proposal for detecting possible lockups, when
> flush_workqueue caller holds a lock (e.g. rtnl_lock) also used in work
> functions.
looks good in principle - did you test it and it caught a bug that wasnt
caught before?
>
* Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my patch proposal for detecting possible lockups, when
flush_workqueue caller holds a lock (e.g. rtnl_lock) also used in work
functions.
looks good in principle - did you test it and it caught a bug that wasnt
caught before?
+#ifdef
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:14:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my patch proposal for detecting possible lockups, when
flush_workqueue caller holds a lock (e.g. rtnl_lock) also used in work
functions.
looks good in principle - did you
Hi,
Here is my patch proposal for detecting possible lockups,
when flush_workqueue caller holds a lock (e.g. rtnl_lock)
also used in work functions.
Regards,
Jarek P.
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.21-rc6-mm1-/kernel/workqueue.c
Hi,
Here is my patch proposal for detecting possible lockups,
when flush_workqueue caller holds a lock (e.g. rtnl_lock)
also used in work functions.
Regards,
Jarek P.
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.21-rc6-mm1-/kernel/workqueue.c
6 matches
Mail list logo