On Friday, 17 August 2007 23:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:22 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > During hibernation and suspend on x86_64 save CPU registers in the
> > saved_context
> > structure rather than in a handful of separate variables.
>
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:22 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During hibernation and suspend on x86_64 save CPU registers in the
> saved_context
> structure rather than in a handful of separate variables.
You have "-mm" in the subject but afaict this patch is not dependent
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
During hibernation and suspend on x86_64 save CPU registers in the saved_context
structure rather than in a handful of separate variables.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks-ok-to: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
During hibernation and suspend on x86_64 save CPU registers in the saved_context
structure rather than in a handful of separate variables.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks-ok-to: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:22 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During hibernation and suspend on x86_64 save CPU registers in the
saved_context
structure rather than in a handful of separate variables.
You have -mm in the subject but afaict this patch is not dependent upon
On Friday, 17 August 2007 23:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:22 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During hibernation and suspend on x86_64 save CPU registers in the
saved_context
structure rather than in a handful of separate variables.
You have -mm
6 matches
Mail list logo