Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:10:28 +0800
> "Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This patch defines a 32-bit boot protocol and adds corresponding
>> document. It is based on the proposal of Peter Anvin.
>>
>>
>> Known issues:
>>
>> - The hd0_info and hd1_info are deleted from t
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:10:28 +0800
"Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch defines a 32-bit boot protocol and adds corresponding
> document. It is based on the proposal of Peter Anvin.
>
>
> Known issues:
>
> - The hd0_info and hd1_info are deleted from the zero page. Additional
>
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 22:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Huang, Ying wrote:
> > Known issues:
> >
> > - The hd0_info and hd1_info are deleted from the zero page. Additional
> > work should be done for this? Or this is unnecessary (because no new
> > fields will be added to zero page)?
> >
>
Huang, Ying wrote:
> Known issues:
>
> - The hd0_info and hd1_info are deleted from the zero page. Additional
> work should be done for this? Or this is unnecessary (because no new
> fields will be added to zero page)?
>
For backwards compatibility, they should be marked as there for the
sho
This patch defines a 32-bit boot protocol and adds corresponding
document. It is based on the proposal of Peter Anvin.
Known issues:
- The hd0_info and hd1_info are deleted from the zero page. Additional
work should be done for this? Or this is unnecessary (because no new
fields will be adde
5 matches
Mail list logo