On 02/14/2014 01:20 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:33:32PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> On 02/13/2014 02:01 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:05:43PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
On 02/12/2014 12:19 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:33:32PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 02:01 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:05:43PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> >> On 02/12/2014 12:19 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:15:26PM +0400, Vladimir Davyd
On 02/13/2014 02:01 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:05:43PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> On 02/12/2014 12:19 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:15:26PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
Hi Michal, Johannes, David,
Could you please take
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:05:43PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 12:19 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:15:26PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> >> Hi Michal, Johannes, David,
> >>
> >> Could you please take a look at this if you have time? Without your
> >
On 02/12/2014 12:19 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:15:26PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> Hi Michal, Johannes, David,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at this if you have time? Without your
>> review, it'll never get committed.
> There is simply no review bandwidth for
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:15:26PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hi Michal, Johannes, David,
>
> Could you please take a look at this if you have time? Without your
> review, it'll never get committed.
There is simply no review bandwidth for new features as long as we are
fixing fundamental bu
On Tue 11-02-14 19:15:26, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hi Michal, Johannes, David,
>
> Could you please take a look at this if you have time? Without your
> review, it'll never get committed.
Yes, it is on my todo list. I could barely catch up with discussions on
the previous versions and felt that
Hi Michal, Johannes, David,
Could you please take a look at this if you have time? Without your
review, it'll never get committed.
Thank you.
On 02/05/2014 10:39 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the 15th iteration of Glauber Costa's patch-set implementing slab
> shrinking on memcg p
Hi,
This is the 15th iteration of Glauber Costa's patch-set implementing slab
shrinking on memcg pressure. The main idea is to make the list_lru structure
used by most FS shrinkers per-memcg. When adding or removing an element from a
list_lru, we use the page information to figure out which memcg
9 matches
Mail list logo