On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Johannes Hirte wrote:
> kernel/watchdog.c:
>
> void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> {
> __this_cpu_write(watchdog_touch_ts, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
>
> Don't know if the change to this_cpu_write() is the right way here too.
Well yes lets
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:29:41 -0600
Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > Booting on my Samsung Series 9 laptop gives me loads and loads of
> > BUGs triggered by __this_cpu_add(), making making the system
> > completely unusable:
> >
> > [
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:29:41 -0600
Josh Cartwright jo...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
Booting on my Samsung Series 9 laptop gives me loads and loads of
BUGs triggered by __this_cpu_add(), making making the system
completely unusable:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Johannes Hirte wrote:
kernel/watchdog.c:
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
__this_cpu_write(watchdog_touch_ts, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
Don't know if the change to this_cpu_write() is the right way here too.
Well yes lets change
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Although, I'm wondering how exact these statistics need to be. Is
> making them preemption safe even a concern?
Not sure about that. You solution makes it preempt safe. If is can be
tolerated that its racy then raw_cpu_inc() could be used.
--
To
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Josh Cartwright wrote:
Although, I'm wondering how exact these statistics need to be. Is
making them preemption safe even a concern?
Not sure about that. You solution makes it preempt safe. If is can be
tolerated that its racy then raw_cpu_inc() could be used.
--
To
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Booting on my Samsung Series 9 laptop gives me loads and loads of BUGs
> triggered by __this_cpu_add(), making making the system completely
> unusable:
>
> [5.808326] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [] code:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
Booting on my Samsung Series 9 laptop gives me loads and loads of BUGs
triggered by __this_cpu_add(), making making the system completely
unusable:
[5.808326] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [] code:
8 matches
Mail list logo
