On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:19:06PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Since I am removing the tsk parameter from all of the synchrnous signal
> sending functions, on all of the architectures it was easier to go
> through my own tree than -tip.
Yeah, I remember reading a mail about it...
> The remo
Borislav Petkov writes:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:37:21PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>> Since the commit "signal: Remove the task parameter from
>> force_sig_fault", "tsk" is only used when MEMORY_FAILURE=y and generates
>> a compilation warning without it.
>>
>> arch/x86/mm/fault.c: In function
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:37:21PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> Since the commit "signal: Remove the task parameter from
> force_sig_fault", "tsk" is only used when MEMORY_FAILURE=y and generates
> a compilation warning without it.
>
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_sigbus':
> arch/x86/mm/fault.
Since the commit "signal: Remove the task parameter from
force_sig_fault", "tsk" is only used when MEMORY_FAILURE=y and generates
a compilation warning without it.
arch/x86/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_sigbus':
arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1017:22: warning: unused variable 'tsk'
[-Wunused-variable]
Also, c
4 matches
Mail list logo
