Re: [PATCH -rt] Make RCU-boost and rcutorture threads freezable

2007-02-04 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 20:22 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > This patch removes PF_NOFREEZE from the rcutorture and RCU-boost threads, > adding try_to_freeze() calls as required. Passes the usual tests, but > I don't have a good freeze test handy as yet. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney

Re: [PATCH -rt] Make RCU-boost and rcutorture threads freezable

2007-02-04 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 20:22 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: This patch removes PF_NOFREEZE from the rcutorture and RCU-boost threads, adding try_to_freeze() calls as required. Passes the usual tests, but I don't have a good freeze test handy as yet. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney

[PATCH -rt] Make RCU-boost and rcutorture threads freezable

2007-02-03 Thread Paul E. McKenney
This patch removes PF_NOFREEZE from the rcutorture and RCU-boost threads, adding try_to_freeze() calls as required. Passes the usual tests, but I don't have a good freeze test handy as yet. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- rcupreempt.c |4 +++- rcutorture.c |9

[PATCH -rt] Make RCU-boost and rcutorture threads freezable

2007-02-03 Thread Paul E. McKenney
This patch removes PF_NOFREEZE from the rcutorture and RCU-boost threads, adding try_to_freeze() calls as required. Passes the usual tests, but I don't have a good freeze test handy as yet. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- rcupreempt.c |4 +++- rcutorture.c |9