On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 02:09:37AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > Just work in progress, not recommended for inclusion. Seems stable
> > under rigorous rcutorture testing, so should be OK for
> > experimentation.
>
> nice stuf
* Paul E. McKenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Just work in progress, not recommended for inclusion. Seems stable
> under rigorous rcutorture testing, so should be OK for
> experimentation.
nice stuff!
i'm wondering, could you try to do this as a splitup against -mm? I
think we
Hello!
Just work in progress, not recommended for inclusion. Seems stable
under rigorous rcutorture testing, so should be OK for experimentation.
This snapshot has an implementation of rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_read_unlock() that may be invoked from NMI/SMI handlers, and that
do not contain any he
3 matches
Mail list logo
