On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
> b40a7959 "freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD".
> v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
>
> b40a7959 is the trivial bugfix, but unfortunately I forgot
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
b40a7959 freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD.
v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
b40a7959 is the trivial bugfix, but unfortunately I forgot that
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:49 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
> b40a7959 "freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD".
> v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
[...]
Thanks very much, I've added this to the queue for 3.2. However,
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:49 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
b40a7959 freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD.
v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
[...]
Thanks very much, I've added this to the queue for 3.2. However, in
This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
b40a7959 "freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD".
v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
b40a7959 is the trivial bugfix, but unfortunately I forgot that
until 34b087e4 "freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal()"
This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
b40a7959 freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD.
v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
b40a7959 is the trivial bugfix, but unfortunately I forgot that
until 34b087e4 freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal()
there
6 matches
Mail list logo