Re: [PATCH -tip 0/2] ftrace: Introduce the new I/F "nr_saved_cmdlines"

Hi, Would you review this patch set? Thanks, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE (2013/11/08 13:26), Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Hi, This patch set introduces the new I/F "nr_saved_cmdlines" for increasing the number of saved cmdlines. Current saved_cmdlines can store just 128 command names and PIDs, but process

Re: [PATCH -tip 0/2] ftrace: Introduce the new I/F nr_saved_cmdlines

Hi, Would you review this patch set? Thanks, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE (2013/11/08 13:26), Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Hi, This patch set introduces the new I/F nr_saved_cmdlines for increasing the number of saved cmdlines. Current saved_cmdlines can store just 128 command names and PIDs, but process

[PATCH -tip 0/2] ftrace: Introduce the new I/F "nr_saved_cmdlines"

Hi, This patch set introduces the new I/F "nr_saved_cmdlines" for increasing the number of saved cmdlines. Current saved_cmdlines can store just 128 command names and PIDs, but process names are often lost like <...> when we read trace data. If the process exists, we can get the name by using ps

[PATCH -tip 0/2] ftrace: Introduce the new I/F nr_saved_cmdlines

Hi, This patch set introduces the new I/F nr_saved_cmdlines for increasing the number of saved cmdlines. Current saved_cmdlines can store just 128 command names and PIDs, but process names are often lost like ... when we read trace data. If the process exists, we can get the name by using ps