Hi Miroslav,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:42:25 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > + */
> > > +static nokprobe_inline void *kretprobe_trampoline_addr(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return dereference_function_descriptor(kretprobe_trampoline);
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > Would it make sense to use this in s390
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:21:01 +0100 (CET)
Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> > --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> > @@ -205,15 +205,23 @@ extern void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct
> > kretprobe_instance *ri,
> >struct pt_regs
Hi Masami,
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -205,15 +205,23 @@ extern void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct
> kretprobe_instance *ri,
> struct pt_regs *regs);
> extern int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
>
> +void
Remove trampoline_address from kretprobe_trampoline_handler().
Instead of passing the address, kretprobe_trampoline_handler()
can use new kretprobe_trampoline_addr().
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
---
arch/arc/kernel/kprobes.c |2 +-
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c |3 +--
4 matches
Mail list logo
