(2014/01/24 21:13), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:49:32AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> (2014/01/24 1:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
>>> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +,
Em Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:49:32AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2014/01/24 1:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
> > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >
> >> Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >>> Since several local
Em Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:49:32AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
(2014/01/24 1:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Since several
(2014/01/24 21:13), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:49:32AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
(2014/01/24 1:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM
(2014/01/24 1:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>> Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>>> Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
>>> we need to use the actual address
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
> > we need to use the actual address instead of symbol name for
> > those points. Note that
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
> we need to use the actual address instead of symbol name for
> those points. Note that this works only with debuginfo.
>
> E.g. without this change;
>
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
we need to use the actual address instead of symbol name for
those points. Note that this works only with debuginfo.
E.g. without this change;
Please use
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
we need to use the actual address instead of symbol name for
those
(2014/01/24 1:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:29:55AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
we need to use the actual
Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
we need to use the actual address instead of symbol name for
those points. Note that this works only with debuginfo.
E.g. without this change;
# ./perf probe -a t_show \$vars
Added new events:
probe:t_show (on t_show
Since several local symbols can have same name (e.g. t_show),
we need to use the actual address instead of symbol name for
those points. Note that this works only with debuginfo.
E.g. without this change;
# ./perf probe -a t_show \$vars
Added new events:
probe:t_show (on t_show
12 matches
Mail list logo