On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 1:59 AM Valentin Schneider
wrote:
>
>
> On 18/12/20 17:09, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > From: Lai Jiangshan
> >
> > When worker_attach_to_pool() is called, we should not put the workers
> > to pool->attrs->cpumask when there is not CPU online in it.
> >
> > We have to use wq_o
On 18/12/20 17:09, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan
>
> When worker_attach_to_pool() is called, we should not put the workers
> to pool->attrs->cpumask when there is not CPU online in it.
>
> We have to use wq_online_cpumask in worker_attach_to_pool() to check
> if pool->attrs->cpumask
From: Lai Jiangshan
When worker_attach_to_pool() is called, we should not put the workers
to pool->attrs->cpumask when there is not CPU online in it.
We have to use wq_online_cpumask in worker_attach_to_pool() to check
if pool->attrs->cpumask is valid rather than cpu_online_mask or
cpu_active_ma
3 matches
Mail list logo