On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:26:55PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:31:06 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:14:03PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > >
> > > Could you review this version?
> >
> > These look good
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:31:06 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:14:03PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Could you review this version?
>
> These look good to me; shall I merge them or what was the plan?
Thanks for the review, yes, could you
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:14:03PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Could you review this version?
These look good to me; shall I merge them or what was the plan?
Hi Peter,
Could you review this version?
Thank you,
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 22:13:37 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 4th version of patches to handle Xen/KVM emulate
> prefix by x86 instruction decoder.
>
> These patches allow x86 instruction decoder to decode
> Xen and KVM e
Hi,
Here is the 4th version of patches to handle Xen/KVM emulate
prefix by x86 instruction decoder.
These patches allow x86 instruction decoder to decode
Xen and KVM emulate prefix correctly, and prohibit kprobes to
probe on it.
Previous version is here;
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/156773433821.3
5 matches
Mail list logo