On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:26:04AM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:07:28AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Will re-implementing your sorting logic
> > in bash look cleaner?
>
> Possibly, I can try, we'll see.
It is somewhat cleaner, but it is _abysmally_ slow.
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:07:28AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Contributors stop caring after their code is merged,
> but maintaining it is tiring.
This seems to hold in general :/
> Will re-implementing your sorting logic
> in bash look cleaner?
Possibly, I can try, we'll see.
> Or, in
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:26 AM wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:58:14AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the long delay.
> >
> > First, this patch breaks 'make TAGS'
> > if 'etags' is a symlink to exuberant ctags.
> >
> >
> > masahiro@oscar:~/ref/linux$ etags --version
> >
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:58:14AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Sorry for the long delay.
>
> First, this patch breaks 'make TAGS'
> if 'etags' is a symlink to exuberant ctags.
>
>
> masahiro@oscar:~/ref/linux$ etags --version
> Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310, Copyright (C) 1996-2009
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:58 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 2:28 AM wrote:
> >
> >
> > One long standing annoyance I have with using vim-tags is that our tags
> > file is not properly sorted. That is, the sorting exhuberant Ctags does
> > is only on the tag itself.
> >
> >
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 2:28 AM wrote:
>
>
> One long standing annoyance I have with using vim-tags is that our tags
> file is not properly sorted. That is, the sorting exhuberant Ctags does
> is only on the tag itself.
>
> The problem with that is that, for example, the tag 'mutex' appears a
>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 02:04:38PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
>
> One long standing annoyance I have with using vim-tags is that our tags
> file is not properly sorted. That is, the sorting exhuberant Ctags does
> is only on the tag itself.
>
> The problem with that is that, for example,
One long standing annoyance I have with using vim-tags is that our tags
file is not properly sorted. That is, the sorting exhuberant Ctags does
is only on the tag itself.
The problem with that is that, for example, the tag 'mutex' appears a
mere 505 times, 492 of those are structure members.
8 matches
Mail list logo