On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:46:00AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:20:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
> > here an attempt at providing a better one.
> >
> > This series is
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:20:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
> here an attempt at providing a better one.
>
> This series is tested on x86_64 (by me) and s390x (heiko).
Works nice. You may include the
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:46:00AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:20:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi all,
After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
here an attempt at providing a better one.
This series is tested on
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:20:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi all,
After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
here an attempt at providing a better one.
This series is tested on x86_64 (by me) and s390x (heiko).
Works nice. You may include the s390
Hi all,
After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
here an attempt at providing a better one.
This series is tested on x86_64 (by me) and s390x (heiko).
---
arch/Kconfig |6 +
arch/arm/include/asm/jump_label.h | 24 ++--
Hi all,
After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
here an attempt at providing a better one.
This series is tested on x86_64 (by me) and s390x (heiko).
---
arch/Kconfig |6 +
arch/arm/include/asm/jump_label.h | 24 ++--
6 matches
Mail list logo
