On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> From: Jacob Shin
>
> Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and
> [ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up
> pfn_mapped ranges instead.
What problem does this fix? How did you find about i
From: Jacob Shin
Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and
[ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up
pfn_mapped ranges instead.
-v2: change applying sequence to keep git bisecting working.
so add dummy pfn_range_is_mapped(). - Yinghai
2 matches
Mail list logo