Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

2008-01-19 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> 2008/1/18, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 4. Performance test was done using the program available from the > > > following link: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14493 > > > > > > Result: the impact of the changes was negligible for files of a few > > > hundred

Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

2008-01-18 Thread Anton Salikhmetov
2008/1/18, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 4. Performance test was done using the program available from the > > following link: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14493 > > > > Result: the impact of the changes was negligible for files of a few > > hundred megabytes. > >

Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

2008-01-18 Thread Anton Salikhmetov
2008/1/18, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 4. Performance test was done using the program available from the > > following link: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14493 > > > > Result: the impact of the changes was negligible for files of a few > > hundred megabytes. > >

Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

2008-01-18 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> 4. Performance test was done using the program available from the > following link: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14493 > > Result: the impact of the changes was negligible for files of a few > hundred megabytes. Could you also test with ext4 and post some numbers? Afaik, e

[PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

2008-01-17 Thread Anton Salikhmetov
This is the sixth version of my solution for the bug #2645: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 New since the previous version: 1) a few cosmetic changes according to the latest feedback for the cleanup patch; 2) implementation of the following suggestion by Miklos Szeredi: http