On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:39:52PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:47AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > > > Andrew, Ple
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:39:52PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:47AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > > Andrew, Please do _NOT_ take this patch series yet. I am sending this
> > > to you because y
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:47AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Andrew, Please do _NOT_ take this patch series yet. I am sending this
> > to you because you had comments on my -v6 submission.
>
> Another reason for not ap
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:47AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Andrew, Please do _NOT_ take this patch series yet. I am sending this
> > to you because you had comments on my -v6 submission.
>
> Another reason for not ap
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> Andrew, Please do _NOT_ take this patch series yet. I am sending this
> to you because you had comments on my -v6 submission.
Another reason for not applying this is that I believe it wilfully breaks
a bunch of ARM platforms - such as
Andrew, Please do _NOT_ take this patch series yet. I am sending this
to you because you had comments on my -v6 submission. If you do take
any of the patches, I believe patches 1-5 would be considered ready for
moving on as you had comments and I don't recall any others. The first
two would real
6 matches
Mail list logo
