On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:56:09AM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>
>
> > On May 7, 2024, at 10:41, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:21:40AM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> transition state. With this marcos renamed, comments are not
> >>> necessary at t
> On May 7, 2024, at 10:41, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:21:40AM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> transition state. With this marcos renamed, comments are not
>>> necessary at this point.
>>>
>> Sorry for my careless, the comment still remains in the code.
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:21:40AM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>
>
> >
> > transition state. With this marcos renamed, comments are not
> > necessary at this point.
> >
> Sorry for my careless, the comment still remains in the code. However,
> comment in the code do no harms here. Maybe it can
>
> transition state. With this marcos renamed, comments are not
> necessary at this point.
>
Sorry for my careless, the comment still remains in the code. However, comment
in the code do no harms here. Maybe it can be kept.
From: Wardenjohn
As the previous described, renaming variables is not a good idead
becase it will break userspace. This patch rename macros of KLP_*
to KLP_TRANSITION_* to fix the confusing description of the klp
transition state. With this marcos renamed, comments are not
necessary at this poin
5 matches
Mail list logo