On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:30:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Obviously, the IRQ arrays are of greater importance for
> size reduction. Any suggestions, or threads I should read
> are gratefully accecpted... ;-)
hard. Convert them to a radix-tree I suppose. powerpc alrady does that
but it
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:30:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, the IRQ arrays are of greater importance for
size reduction. Any suggestions, or threads I should read
are gratefully accecpted... ;-)
hard. Convert them to a radix-tree I suppose. powerpc alrady does that
but it
v2: rebasing on 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
Analyzing various data structures when NR_CPU count is raised
to 4096 shows the following arrays over 128k. If the maximum
number of cpus are not installed (about 99.99% of the time),
then a large percentage of this memory is wasted.
--
151289856 CALNDATA
Analyzing various data structures when NR_CPU count is raised
to 4096 shows the following arrays over 128k. If the maximum
number of cpus are not installed (about 99.99% of the time),
then a large percentage of this memory is wasted.
--
151289856 CALNDATA irq_desc
135530496
Analyzing various data structures when NR_CPU count is raised
to 4096 shows the following arrays over 128k. If the maximum
number of cpus are not installed (about 99.99% of the time),
then a large percentage of this memory is wasted.
--
151289856 CALNDATA irq_desc
135530496
v2: rebasing on 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
Analyzing various data structures when NR_CPU count is raised
to 4096 shows the following arrays over 128k. If the maximum
number of cpus are not installed (about 99.99% of the time),
then a large percentage of this memory is wasted.
--
151289856 CALNDATA
6 matches
Mail list logo