Re: [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2015-04-05 Thread Julia Lawall
Please ignore. Wrong patch set. On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially > nonnegative. > > The complete semantic match that finds the problem is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // > @ok exists@ > identif

[PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2015-04-05 Thread Julia Lawall
These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially nonnegative. The complete semantic match that finds the problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @ok exists@ identifier f,ret,i; expression e; constant c; @@ f(...) { <+... ( return -c@i; | ret = -c@i; ... w

Re: [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2014-11-23 Thread Julia Lawall
Oops!!! These are ancient patches. I meant to send something else. Sorry for the noise. julia On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially > nonnegative. > > The complete semantic match that finds the problem is as foll

[PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2014-11-23 Thread Julia Lawall
These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially nonnegative. The complete semantic match that finds the problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @ok exists@ identifier f,ret,i; expression e; constant c; @@ f(...) { <+... ( return -c@i; | ret = -c@i; ... w

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2012-08-20 Thread Julia Lawall
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:02:51 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially nonnegative. The patch 10/10 seems missing. Or are all 9 patches? The patch number suddenly changes to X/9 from 4. In

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2012-08-20 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:02:51 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially > nonnegative. The patch 10/10 seems missing. Or are all 9 patches? The patch number suddenly changes to X/9 from 4. In anyway, the patches 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9

[PATCH 0/10] fix error return code

2012-08-19 Thread Julia Lawall
These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially nonnegative. The complete semantic match that finds the problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @ok exists@ identifier f,ret,i; expression e; constant c; @@ f(...) { <+... ( return -c@i; | ret = -c@i; ... w