Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules

2021-04-07 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 01:53:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > On 4/7/21 12:10 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 18:53 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:53:38PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > > This series adds support for ECDSA-signed kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules

2021-04-07 Thread Stefan Berger
On 4/7/21 12:10 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 18:53 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:53:38PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: This series adds support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules. The first patch in this series attempts to address the issue where a

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules

2021-04-07 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 18:53 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:53:38PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > This series adds support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules. > > > > The first patch in this series attempts to address the issue where a > > developer created an ECDSA key

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules

2021-04-07 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:53:38PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > This series adds support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules. > > The first patch in this series attempts to address the issue where a > developer created an ECDSA key for signing modules and then falls back > to compiling an older

[PATCH 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules

2021-04-06 Thread Stefan Berger
This series adds support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules. The first patch in this series attempts to address the issue where a developer created an ECDSA key for signing modules and then falls back to compiling an older version of the kernel that does not support ECDSA keys. In this case this