On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:23:02PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2018-07-25 14:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
> > when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
> > enforcing
On 2018-07-25 14:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
> when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
> enforcing the alternative signal stack to be at least SIGMINSTKSZ bytes,
> which is
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:18:11PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >This is a resend of:
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
> >
> >now based on 4.19-rc2.
> >
> >The Debian
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:18:11PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >This is a resend of:
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
> >
> >now based on 4.19-rc2.
> >
> >The Debian
[ Re-sending without the corporate footer garbage... ]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is a resend of:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
>
>now based on 4.19-rc2.
>
>The Debian folks have observed a
[ Re-sending without the corporate footer garbage... ]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is a resend of:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
>
>now based on 4.19-rc2.
>
>The Debian folks have observed a
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is a resend of:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
>
>now based on 4.19-rc2.
>
>The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
>when running under
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is a resend of:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
>
>now based on 4.19-rc2.
>
>The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
>when running under
Hi all,
[+ more people from get_maintainers.pl]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> This is a resend of:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
>
> now based on 4.19-rc2.
>
> The Debian folks have observed a failure in the
Hi all,
[+ more people from get_maintainers.pl]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> This is a resend of:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
>
> now based on 4.19-rc2.
>
> The Debian folks have observed a failure in the
Hi all,
This is a resend of:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
now based on 4.19-rc2.
The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
enforcing
Hi all,
This is a resend of:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
now based on 4.19-rc2.
The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
enforcing
Hi all,
The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
enforcing the alternative signal stack to be at least SIGMINSTKSZ bytes,
which is higher for native arm64 tasks than compat 32-bit tasks.
Hi all,
The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
enforcing the alternative signal stack to be at least SIGMINSTKSZ bytes,
which is higher for native arm64 tasks than compat 32-bit tasks.
14 matches
Mail list logo