Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > James Morris wrote: > > > $ git pull > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > > keys-fixes-20161124-3 > > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124-3 > > Ummm... Weird. I can see the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > James Morris wrote: > > > $ git pull > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > > keys-fixes-20161124-3 > > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124-3 > > Ummm... Weird. I can see the tag through the web

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

James Morris wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124-3 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124-3 Ummm... Weird. I can see the tag through the web interface:

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

James Morris wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124-3 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124-3 Ummm... Weird. I can see the tag through the web interface:

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > James Morris wrote: > > > $ git pull > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > > keys-fixes-20161124 > > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 > > I've produced two further versions

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > James Morris wrote: > > > $ git pull > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > > keys-fixes-20161124 > > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 > > I've produced two further versions of this. Can you

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

James Morris wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 I've produced two further versions of this. Can you look at keys-fixes-20161124-3 instead?

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

James Morris wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 I've produced two further versions of this. Can you look at keys-fixes-20161124-3 instead? David

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > > Hi James, > > Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include > the following: > > (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent > [CVE-2016-8650]. > > (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > > Hi James, > > Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include > the following: > > (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent > [CVE-2016-8650]. > > (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. >

[PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes [ver #3]

Hi James, Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include the following: (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent [CVE-2016-8650]. (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. Ver #3: - Integrate my and Andrey's patches for mpi_powm() and

[PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes [ver #3]

Hi James, Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include the following: (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent [CVE-2016-8650]. (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. Ver #3: - Integrate my and Andrey's patches for mpi_powm() and

[PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes [ver #2]

Hi James, Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include the following: (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent [CVE-2016-8650]. (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. Ver #2: - Use RESIZE_IF_NEEDED() to conditionally resize the

[PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes [ver #2]

Hi James, Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include the following: (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent [CVE-2016-8650]. (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. Ver #2: - Use RESIZE_IF_NEEDED() to conditionally resize the

[PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

Hi James, Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include the following: (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent [CVE-2016-8650]. (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. The patches can be found here also:

[PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

Hi James, Can you pull these patches please and pass them on to Linus? They include the following: (1) Fix mpi_powm()'s handling of a number with a zero exponent [CVE-2016-8650]. (2) Fix double free in X.509 error handling. The patches can be found here also: