On Friday, July 21, 2017 06:13:45 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The first patch addresses a potential confusion regarding messages printed
> > by
> > the suspend core code to the kernel log and the second
On Friday, July 21, 2017 06:13:45 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The first patch addresses a potential confusion regarding messages printed
> > by
> > the suspend core code to the kernel log and the second one adds a pr_fmt()
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first patch addresses a potential confusion regarding messages printed by
> the suspend core code to the kernel log and the second one adds a pr_fmt() to
> kernel/power/suspend.c.
>
> The patches are on
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first patch addresses a potential confusion regarding messages printed by
> the suspend core code to the kernel log and the second one adds a pr_fmt() to
> kernel/power/suspend.c.
>
> The patches are on top of the series I
Hi,
The first patch addresses a potential confusion regarding messages printed by
the suspend core code to the kernel log and the second one adds a pr_fmt() to
kernel/power/suspend.c.
The patches are on top of the series I posted yesterday:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm=150059650805506=2
Hi,
The first patch addresses a potential confusion regarding messages printed by
the suspend core code to the kernel log and the second one adds a pr_fmt() to
kernel/power/suspend.c.
The patches are on top of the series I posted yesterday:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm=150059650805506=2
6 matches
Mail list logo