Hi Martin,
I commented on your patch, but I want to add a little bit more in response here.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> One downside with the solution in this set of patches is that more
> lines are added to the driver.
> By making use of the i2c_driver.detect()
Hi Martin,
I commented on your patch, but I want to add a little bit more in response here.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
One downside with the solution in this set of patches is that more
lines are added to the driver.
By making use of the
2013/7/18 Benson Leung
>
> The following patch series refactors the dmi check system and
> returns -EPROBE_DEFER when an expected i2c adapter is not present
> at probe time.
>
> This will allow the touchpad, touchscreen, and light sensors on
> Pixel to load even if the i915 DDC and PANEL buses
2013/7/18 Benson Leung ble...@chromium.org
The following patch series refactors the dmi check system and
returns -EPROBE_DEFER when an expected i2c adapter is not present
at probe time.
This will allow the touchpad, touchscreen, and light sensors on
Pixel to load even if the i915 DDC and
The following patch series refactors the dmi check system and
returns -EPROBE_DEFER when an expected i2c adapter is not present
at probe time.
This will allow the touchpad, touchscreen, and light sensors on
Pixel to load even if the i915 DDC and PANEL buses are instantiated
after chromeos_laptop.
The following patch series refactors the dmi check system and
returns -EPROBE_DEFER when an expected i2c adapter is not present
at probe time.
This will allow the touchpad, touchscreen, and light sensors on
Pixel to load even if the i915 DDC and PANEL buses are instantiated
after chromeos_laptop.
6 matches
Mail list logo
