On 14.10.20 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices, so it doesn't need
PCI support built in. Currently, XEN_PVH depends on XEN_PVHVM which
depends on PCI.
The first patch introduces XEN_PVHVM_GUEST as a toplevel item and
changes XEN_PVHVM to a hidden vari
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:04 PM Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2020 18:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices,
>
> [*] Yet.
:)
> > so it doesn't need PCI support built in.
>
> Untangling the dependences is a good thing, but eventually we plan to
> put
On 14/10/2020 18:53, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices,
[*] Yet.
> so it doesn't need PCI support built in.
Untangling the dependences is a good thing, but eventually we plan to
put an optional PCI bus back in, e.g. for SRIOV usecases.
~Andrew
A Xen PVH domain doesn't have a PCI bus or devices, so it doesn't need
PCI support built in. Currently, XEN_PVH depends on XEN_PVHVM which
depends on PCI.
The first patch introduces XEN_PVHVM_GUEST as a toplevel item and
changes XEN_PVHVM to a hidden variable. This allows XEN_PVH to depend
on XE
4 matches
Mail list logo