Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:30:14AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > If I understand correctly we do not have subclasses so it will look like > class > |- input_device > | |- input0 > | |- input1 > | > |- input > | |-event0 > | |-event1 > | |-mouse0 > > So breakage is really minimal. I really

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:56:16 +0100, Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:20:40PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > >>I was mostly talking about the need of 2 separate classes and this > >>patch lays groundwork for it althou lifetime rules in

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:20:40PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:58:20 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jan

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:20:40PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:58:20 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:56:16 +0100, Hannes Reinecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:20:40PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: I was mostly talking about the need of 2 separate classes and this patch lays groundwork for it althou lifetime rules in input system

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:30:14AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: If I understand correctly we do not have subclasses so it will look like class |- input_device | |- input0 | |- input1 | |- input | |-event0 | |-event1 | |-mouse0 So breakage is really minimal. I really want

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:20:40PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:58:20 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:58:20 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks > > all sorts of assertions especially when using udev. > > And it's

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Hi all, > > the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks > all sorts of assertions especially when using udev. > And it's definitely going to fail once someone is trying to use netlink > messages for

[PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

Hi all, the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks all sorts of assertions especially when using udev. And it's definitely going to fail once someone is trying to use netlink messages for hotplug event delivery. To remedy this I've implemented a new sysfs class

[PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

Hi all, the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks all sorts of assertions especially when using udev. And it's definitely going to fail once someone is trying to use netlink messages for hotplug event delivery. To remedy this I've implemented a new sysfs class

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Hi all, the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks all sorts of assertions especially when using udev. And it's definitely going to fail once someone is trying to use netlink messages for hotplug

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Hi all, the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks all sorts of assertions especially when using udev. And it's definitely

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Hi all, the input subsystem is using call_usermodehelper directly, which breaks all

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:58:20 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Hi all, the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove input_call_hotplug

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:20:40PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:58:20 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:49:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:30:02 -0800, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005