On 10/01, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > This patch just makes the SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check in
> > task_will_free_mem()
> > a bit more correct wrt CLONE_VM tasks, nothing more.
>
> OK. Then, that's out of what I can understand. But I wish for
> some description to PATCH 2/2 ab
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This patch just makes the SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check in task_will_free_mem()
> a bit more correct wrt CLONE_VM tasks, nothing more.
OK. Then, that's out of what I can understand. But I wish for
some description to PATCH 2/2 about why to change from
"do { } while_each_thread
On 09/30, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Just in case, this doesn't depend on the previous series I sent.
> >
> > Tetsuo, iirc we already discussed the change in 1/2 some time ago,
> > could you review?
> >
> > Oleg.
>
> I tested patch 1/2 and 2/2 on next-20150929 using reproducer
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Just in case, this doesn't depend on the previous series I sent.
>
> Tetsuo, iirc we already discussed the change in 1/2 some time ago,
> could you review?
>
> Oleg.
I tested patch 1/2 and 2/2 on next-20150929 using reproducer at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201503150240.gii00
Just in case, this doesn't depend on the previous series I sent.
Tetsuo, iirc we already discussed the change in 1/2 some time ago,
could you review?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majord
5 matches
Mail list logo
