Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/regulator: Handle regulators that defer probe with device tree bindings

2013-04-04 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:21:46PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Nishanth Menon (2): > regulator: core: return err value for regulator_get if there is no DT > binding > cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: defer probe when regulator is not ready For both, Acked-by: Shawn Guo -- To unsubscribe from t

Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/regulator: Handle regulators that defer probe with device tree bindings

2013-04-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 5 April 2013 09:51, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Currently get_regulator returns -EPROBE_DEFER in the case of regulator supply > which have no device tree node or even if regulator which are depicted in > device > tree node is defering it's registration for valid reasons. > > This makes it impossib

[PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/regulator: Handle regulators that defer probe with device tree bindings

2013-04-04 Thread Nishanth Menon
Hi, Currently get_regulator returns -EPROBE_DEFER in the case of regulator supply which have no device tree node or even if regulator which are depicted in device tree node is defering it's registration for valid reasons. This makes it impossible to use an regulator that registers itself after cpu