Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-17 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Suparna Bhattacharya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:00:11PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. > > > > > > Where "some time" ==

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-17 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Suparna Bhattacharya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:00:11PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. Where some time == nearly six months.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-16 Thread Suparna Bhattacharya
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:00:11PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. > > > > Where "some time" == "nearly six months". > > > > We need help considering, reviewing

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-16 Thread Suparna Bhattacharya
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:00:11PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. Where some time == nearly six months. We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. > > Where "some time" == "nearly six months". > > We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code, please. I did quick scan, and it looks ok. Plus, it

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. Where some time == nearly six months. We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code, please. I did quick scan, and it looks ok. Plus, it means we can

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 8 May 2007 14:15:48 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. Where "some time" == "nearly six months". We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code, please. - To unsubscribe from this list:

[PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-08 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. The first implements file capabilities, the second changes the format a bit to accomodate potential future 64-bit capabilities. We are hoping to get a few more eyes on the code before deciding whether this is safe to finally

[PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-08 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. The first implements file capabilities, the second changes the format a bit to accomodate potential future 64-bit capabilities. We are hoping to get a few more eyes on the code before deciding whether this is safe to finally

Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: Introduction

2007-05-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 8 May 2007 14:15:48 -0500 Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm. Where some time == nearly six months. We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code, please. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the