On 12/03, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Depends on
> > [PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119653436116036
> >
> > Needs review and testing.
> >
> > Please comment, I think
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Depends on
> [PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119653436116036
>
> Needs review and testing.
>
> Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
It looks clean
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Depends on
[PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119653436116036
Needs review and testing.
Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
It looks clean and
On 12/03, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Depends on
[PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119653436116036
Needs review and testing.
Please comment, I think at least the idea
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> exec() from the signal handler doesn't do sys_sigreturn(), so we don't unblock
> the signal, and it remains blocked after exec().
>
> Hmm. Is this linux bug, or application bug?
I think that's an application bug.
The kernel does the obvious (and
On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
>
> s??n, 02 12 2007 kl. 20:18 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
> > On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
> > >
> > > I have an issue that sounds related, but I might be completely off. I
> > > would expect the simple attached program to keep receiving the same
>
søn, 02 12 2007 kl. 20:18 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
> On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
> >
> > s??n, 02 12 2007 kl. 18:14 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
> > >
> > > Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
> > >
> > I have an issue that sounds related, but I might be
On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
>
> s??n, 02 12 2007 kl. 18:14 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
> >
> > Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
> >
> I have an issue that sounds related, but I might be completely off. I
> would expect the simple attached program to keep
søn, 02 12 2007 kl. 18:14 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
> Depends on
> [PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119653436116036
>
> Needs review and testing.
>
> Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
>
I
Depends on
[PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119653436116036
Needs review and testing.
Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Depends on
[PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119653436116036
Needs review and testing.
Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
søn, 02 12 2007 kl. 18:14 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
Depends on
[PATCH] __group_complete_signal: fix coredump with group stop race
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119653436116036
Needs review and testing.
Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
I have an
On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
s??n, 02 12 2007 kl. 18:14 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
I have an issue that sounds related, but I might be completely off. I
would expect the simple attached program to keep receiving the
søn, 02 12 2007 kl. 20:18 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
s??n, 02 12 2007 kl. 18:14 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
Please comment, I think at least the idea is promising.
I have an issue that sounds related, but I might be completely off. I
On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
s??n, 02 12 2007 kl. 20:18 +0300, skrev Oleg Nesterov:
On 12/02, Simon Holm Th?gersen wrote:
I have an issue that sounds related, but I might be completely off. I
would expect the simple attached program to keep receiving the same
signal, i.e.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
exec() from the signal handler doesn't do sys_sigreturn(), so we don't unblock
the signal, and it remains blocked after exec().
Hmm. Is this linux bug, or application bug?
I think that's an application bug.
The kernel does the obvious (and
16 matches
Mail list logo