om
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 March, 2017 10:40:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] key payload access with just rcu_read_lock()
>
> Jan Stancek <jstan...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > That problem didn't show up with my NFS based reproducer.
> > I re-run it again with latest v
- Original Message -
> From: "David Howells"
> To: "Jan Stancek"
> Cc: dhowe...@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-...@vger.kernel.org, bcodd...@redhat.com,
> asav...@redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 March, 2017 10:40:13 AM
> Su
Jan Stancek wrote:
> That problem didn't show up with my NFS based reproducer.
> I re-run it again with latest version of your patch, plus also
> keyutils testsuite. Both completed OK for me, dmesg looks clean.
Can I put you down as a Tested-by?
David
Jan Stancek wrote:
> That problem didn't show up with my NFS based reproducer.
> I re-run it again with latest version of your patch, plus also
> keyutils testsuite. Both completed OK for me, dmesg looks clean.
Can I put you down as a Tested-by?
David
- Original Message -
> Here's an updated patch with fixed user_key_payload_locked() and user_read().
>
That problem didn't show up with my NFS based reproducer.
I re-run it again with latest version of your patch, plus also
keyutils testsuite. Both completed OK for me, dmesg looks
- Original Message -
> Here's an updated patch with fixed user_key_payload_locked() and user_read().
>
That problem didn't show up with my NFS based reproducer.
I re-run it again with latest version of your patch, plus also
keyutils testsuite. Both completed OK for me, dmesg looks
Here's an updated patch with fixed user_key_payload_locked() and user_read().
David
---
commit f57350ca3480c418dbc20bf73a7678a7f8e3e4ab
Author: David Howells
Date: Tue Feb 28 10:08:01 2017 +
KEYS: Differentiate uses of rcu_dereference_key() and user_key_payload()
Here's an updated patch with fixed user_key_payload_locked() and user_read().
David
---
commit f57350ca3480c418dbc20bf73a7678a7f8e3e4ab
Author: David Howells
Date: Tue Feb 28 10:08:01 2017 +
KEYS: Differentiate uses of rcu_dereference_key() and user_key_payload()
- Original Message -
> Jan Stancek wrote:
>
> > Looks like there are still couple users that need updating,
> > I'm hitting following compilation error:
>
> Aargh - I remembered to grep for rcu_dereference_key() but not
> user_key_payload().
>
> How about the
- Original Message -
> Jan Stancek wrote:
>
> > Looks like there are still couple users that need updating,
> > I'm hitting following compilation error:
>
> Aargh - I remembered to grep for rcu_dereference_key() but not
> user_key_payload().
>
> How about the attached?
v2 builds OK
m
> Sent: Monday, 27 February, 2017 11:04:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] key payload access with just rcu_read_lock()
>
> Jan Stancek <jstan...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > this is a follow-up for "suspicious RCU usage" warning described
> > in these 2
- Original Message -
> From: "David Howells"
> To: "Jan Stancek"
> Cc: dhowe...@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-...@vger.kernel.org, bcodd...@redhat.com,
> asav...@redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, 27 February, 2017 11:04:21 PM
> Su
Jan Stancek wrote:
> Looks like there are still couple users that need updating,
> I'm hitting following compilation error:
Aargh - I remembered to grep for rcu_dereference_key() but not
user_key_payload().
How about the attached?
David
---
commit
Jan Stancek wrote:
> Looks like there are still couple users that need updating,
> I'm hitting following compilation error:
Aargh - I remembered to grep for rcu_dereference_key() but not
user_key_payload().
How about the attached?
David
---
commit f0268360a253f0f86b9ec538ae3755e187229bbb
Jan Stancek wrote:
> this is a follow-up for "suspicious RCU usage" warning described
> in these 2 linux-nfs threads:
> http://marc.info/?t=14755883033=1=2
> http://marc.info/?t=14877677051=1=2
>
> Did you have something like in mind?
How about the attached?
Jan Stancek wrote:
> this is a follow-up for "suspicious RCU usage" warning described
> in these 2 linux-nfs threads:
> http://marc.info/?t=14755883033=1=2
> http://marc.info/?t=14877677051=1=2
>
> Did you have something like in mind?
How about the attached? It's similar to what
Hi David,
this is a follow-up for "suspicious RCU usage" warning described
in these 2 linux-nfs threads:
http://marc.info/?t=14755883033=1=2
http://marc.info/?t=14877677051=1=2
Did you have something like in mind?
Thanks,
Jan
Jan Stancek (2):
KEYS: add user_key_payload_rcu()
Hi David,
this is a follow-up for "suspicious RCU usage" warning described
in these 2 linux-nfs threads:
http://marc.info/?t=14755883033=1=2
http://marc.info/?t=14877677051=1=2
Did you have something like in mind?
Thanks,
Jan
Jan Stancek (2):
KEYS: add user_key_payload_rcu()
18 matches
Mail list logo