On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 02:44 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:07:28PM -0400, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> > [resend because half the recipients got dropped due to IPv6
> > firewall issues]
> >
> > Introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK semantics, which result in a VMA being
> > empty in
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:07:28PM -0400, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> [resend because half the recipients got dropped due to IPv6 firewall issues]
>
> Introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK semantics, which result in a VMA being
> empty in the child process after fork. This differs from MADV_DONTFORK
> in one imp
[resend because half the recipients got dropped due to IPv6 firewall issues]
Introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK semantics, which result in a VMA being
empty in the child process after fork. This differs from MADV_DONTFORK
in one important way.
If a child process accesses memory that was MADV_WIPEONFORK, i
3 matches
Mail list logo