Hi Lee,
On 04/29/2014 04:02 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
From: Micky Ching
The commit have some problem,
using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
these problem, and better to use a new method. So just remove it.
The commit depends
on the previous patch. And
> From: Micky Ching
>
> The commit have some
> problem,
> using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
> these problem, and better to use a new method. So just remove it.
>
> The commit depends
> on the previous patch. And mainly fix some problem for the
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
The commit mmc: rtsx: add support for pre_req and post_req have some
problem,
using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
these problem, and better to use a new method. So just remove it.
The commit mmc: rtsx:
Hi Lee,
On 04/29/2014 04:02 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
The commit mmc: rtsx: add support for pre_req and post_req have some problem,
using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
these problem, and better to use a new
From: Micky Ching
The commit have some problem,
using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
these problem, and better to use a new method. So just remove it.
The commit depends
on the previous patch. And mainly fix some problem for the previous patch. So
need
From: Micky Ching micky_ch...@realsil.com.cn
The commit mmc: rtsx: add support for pre_req and post_req have some problem,
using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
these problem, and better to use a new method. So just remove it.
The commit mmc: rtsx: modify
6 matches
Mail list logo
