Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-15 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 15 October 2018 at 09:33, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Some sub-systems rebase, and some do not. >> It is up to the sub-system maintainer. > > We used to have a very strict rule to not rebase anything which ends up > in linux-next. Dunno what happened to this rule but I liked it. > >> I know what

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-15 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 15 October 2018 at 09:33, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Some sub-systems rebase, and some do not. >> It is up to the sub-system maintainer. > > We used to have a very strict rule to not rebase anything which ends up > in linux-next. Dunno what happened to this rule but I liked it. > >> I know what

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Some sub-systems rebase, and some do not. > It is up to the sub-system maintainer. We used to have a very strict rule to not rebase anything which ends up in linux-next. Dunno what happened to this rule but I liked it. > I know what you are saying, but this is how we develop in linux-next. I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Some sub-systems rebase, and some do not. > It is up to the sub-system maintainer. We used to have a very strict rule to not rebase anything which ends up in linux-next. Dunno what happened to this rule but I liked it. > I know what you are saying, but this is how we develop in linux-next. I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-14 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 7:33 AM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, > > I found my stupid mistakes. > > I don't have the uniphier HW but I still had a look at these patches. > You never know if there is something interesting for SDHI in there :) > > > Can you squash

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-14 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 7:33 AM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, > > I found my stupid mistakes. > > I don't have the uniphier HW but I still had a look at these patches. > You never know if there is something interesting for SDHI in there :) > > > Can you squash

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
> In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, > I found my stupid mistakes. I don't have the uniphier HW but I still had a look at these patches. You never know if there is something interesting for SDHI in there :) > Can you squash this series into > 3fd784f745dd > "mmc: uniphier-sd: add UniPhier

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
> In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, > I found my stupid mistakes. I don't have the uniphier HW but I still had a look at these patches. You never know if there is something interesting for SDHI in there :) > Can you squash this series into > 3fd784f745dd > "mmc: uniphier-sd: add UniPhier

[PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-12 Thread Masahiro Yamada
In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, I found my stupid mistakes. Ulf, Can you squash this series into 3fd784f745dd "mmc: uniphier-sd: add UniPhier SD/eMMC controller driver" if you have a chance to do rebase? Of course, it is OK to apply this series on top of your next branch if it is too late.

[PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes

2018-10-12 Thread Masahiro Yamada
In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, I found my stupid mistakes. Ulf, Can you squash this series into 3fd784f745dd "mmc: uniphier-sd: add UniPhier SD/eMMC controller driver" if you have a chance to do rebase? Of course, it is OK to apply this series on top of your next branch if it is too late.